Making little sense of recent suspensions

I’ll be completely honest.

When the NHL resumed after that spectacle of amazing hockey we saw during the Olympics, it took me a few games to get back into the swing. Actually, to tell you the truth, league hockey was pretty much boring me to sleep.

But I’m feeling 100 per cent physically again and am fully re-engaged and ready to embark on my favourite time of year, hockey playoffs. Of course the actual post season is a few weeks away still but for many teams – with the new parody of the league it’s probably most teams – crunch time has long begun.

And simply because of the sheer numbers, we could be in for one of the best regular-season finishes ever. Will Detroit miss the playoffs, ending 18-straight years and the longest active playoff streak in North American professional sports? A 2-1 win over the Flames says no but their lead over Calgary sits at just three.

Who will claim the final spots in the East? An explosive restart after the Olympics for the Habs makes a statement, but teams I cheer for don’t stand much chance in the grand scheme so only time will tell.

Even the bottom of the heap is fun to watch, as we all watch the Taylor Hall sweepstakes. Of course the lottery ensures last place won’t be a lock for No. 1 but that doesn’t stop us from wondering about stuff like if Edmonton will finally get some luck or if Toronto will be watching Beantown take Hall with the Leafs’ pick.

But with everything great about the league right now and all the races and drama coming down the stretch, the stories garnering the most attention – at least in the U.S., where we seem to want the game to grow so badly – are the suspensions (or lack there of) resulting from dirty hits.

Most notably of course is the Great Eight Alex Ovechkin, who pushed Chicago’s Brian Campbell from behind at full speed into the boards, breaking his clavicle and ribs. But two others – Montreal’s Max Lapierre on the Sharks’ Scott Nichol and Pittsburgh’s Matt Cooke on the Bruins’ Marc Savard – occurred in almost the same week and when all three resulted in different punishments, the debate began.

Let’s start with Lapierre because he probably received a punishment closest to the level of his crime. The mouthy Canadien blatantly pushed Nichol from behind into the boards, knocking Nichol out for 7-10 days.

Lapierre smirked on the bench afterwards, showing zero remorse for being a total disgrace to the greatest sport on earth, and got tagged with a four-game suspension. The fact is Lapierre is a no-name player who just gets playing time in the league because he plays like a pest. Only he’s terrible at it, runs from physicality after the whistle and hasn’t contributed on the score sheet in any real positive fashion all season.

Basically, he’s easy to hit big. They could have given him lots more and no one would have complained.

Matt Cooke, who put his shoulder so square into the temple of Savard that the small Bruin playmaker likely won’t go a day without a headache until Christmas, is just barely a step up from Lapierre and could have been hit hard and fast by the league.

Instead, however, the NHL gives him nothing. Not one single game. In fact, Cooke didn’t even sit for two minutes or less in the penalty box.

And I know that clearly means the league agrees with the referee’s call that the hit was clean but you can be the judge:

Now I’m fine with being disagreed with so if you also find that hit to be clean, please let me know in the comments section. But if you could just make sure to include the exact words the league should say to the family of the first player who doesn’t wake up from a hit like that, I would appreciate it.

Finally, we have Ovechkin, whose hit was much like Lapierre’s, though Ovy’s clearly didn’t have the same malicious intent and it looked like he wished it hadn’t happened afterwards. But Ovechkin is a repeat offender and the hit was about as dirty as he’s had. Yet he gets two games.

Now I’ve already come out in support of taking the injury out of the equation because some guys can take more punishment than others and that doesn’t change the dirtiness of the play. However, at the speed in which Campbell hit those boards, I can’t think of too many athletes who could have escaped without similar injuries, if not much worse.

Not to mention the fact Ovechkin just took out one of the top defencemen on possibly the biggest competition Washington might face in a Stanley Cup final.

I guess  my question in all of this is, how is one of these any less terrible than the other? And then my second question is, how do they decide on these suspensions in the first place? We’re always told of these hearings with Colin Campbell, who then hands out a ruling, but what the hell does that really mean? Does he think he’s fooling people with these calls?

There can only be so many explanations to this. Maybe Campbell’s under pressure from something at home and is too distracted to make rational decisions. Maybe he’s a drinker. Or maybe he doesn’t decide on suspensions at all and maybe they have that monkey from TSN come in to spin a wheel. (Maggie, not Cybulski.)

The point is, while you can’t just write a rule book to govern all these hits because they differ so much, you can certainly show consistency, especially with incidents so close together.

This double standard and wishy-washy way of running a league will only make them look stupid and then the NHL’s already-fragile reputation will be down the toilet for good.

And how far can that really be away? My cousin sent me a message today essentially comparing the league’s officiating to the CFL.

Need I say more?


3 Responses to “Making little sense of recent suspensions”

  1. Something is wrong with the universe. I’m agreeing with you on this and a bunch of other stuff.

  2. Well the problem is that the players have no respect for each other or the game. You even said it at the start of your blog, the NHL is boring compared to the hockey we just witnessed, therefore take way some of these teams (especially the teams that have don’t make cash) thus taking away the goons that do nothing for games. Also take away “instigator” rule and let players police themselves, or if a player is injured for the 7-10 games, the goon who put him there is out the same amount of time……..Random thoughts

    • I agree the respect is much different in some cases but the good ol’ days had some pretty dirty play too. Just ask fans of the Rocket, who caused a famous riot 55 years and one day ago because he was deliberately struck in the head by a stick and retaliated by two handing the guy in the face and shoulder. Then after the linesman restrained him, allowing the idiot Bruin to sucker Maurice, the Rocket turned around and punched the ref twice in the face. Not too respectful by anyone involved I would say… I’d simply be satisfied if the league showed some consistency in policing itself.
      And I’m not an advocate for the eye-for-an-eye suspensions either. As I’ve said before, a victim’s ability – or lack there of – for withstanding injury does not always compare proportionately to the severity of the play. Had Campbell’s collar bone and ribs not be broke and had he not been knocked out for the rest of the season, would Ovy’s hit become less dangerous in your eyes?? Not mine. And not Brad Hornung’s either I would assume. A hit from behind WILL cause a death before we stop watching this sport unless they learn to control players. You do that by hitting ALL of the offenders much harder than two games worth and you do it consistently until they get their shit together. Regardless of whether the guy they hit misses the year, a week or not one shift.
      I also agree they could prosper from losing five-eight teams but our choices for who would come out would be quite bias. How do you decide? Can’t be just money because some teams that lose money have huge fan bases and some teams with crappy fans aren’t losing their shirts over it. And you can’t let the players’ desire to be in a particular city decide either, because the last place statistics say players want to go is Edmonton. And a league without the Oil would leave some people I know pretty distraught…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: